Tobacco Scam: Smokefree Restaurants: Resource Library - Tobacco Industry
 
Tobacco Scam: Smokefree Restaurants    
 
Tobacco Industry        
    Learn more about the tobacco industry's massive campaign to discredit and confuse the scientific evidence that secondhand smoke is dangerous. (listed in reverse chronological order)

  • Tong EK, Glantz SA
    Tobacco Industry Efforts Undermining Evidence Linking Secondhand Smoke With Cardiovascular Disease
    Circulation 2007;116:1845-1854 [PDF]


  • Sebrié EM, Glantz SA
    "Accommodating" smoke-free policies: tobacco industry's Courtesy of Choice programme in Latin America
    Tobacco Control 2007 16: 350 [PDF]


  • Bero L, Glantz S, Hong M
    The limits of competing interest disclosure
    Tobacco Control 2005;14;118-126 [ PDF ]


  • Mandel LL, Glantz SA
    Hedging their bets: tobacco and gambling industries work against smoke-free policies
    Tobacco Control 2004;13:268–276 [ PDF ]


  • America Nonsmokers Rights Foundation
    Big Tobacco Serves the "Butt End" to the National Restaurant Association
    December 2003 [ Powerpoint (3.4 Meg) ]


  • J Barnoya, S Glantz
    Tobacco industry success in preventing regulation of secondhand smoke in Latin America: the "Latin Project"
    Tobacco Control 2002;11:305­314 [PDF]


  • Ong EK, Glantz SA
    Constructing "sound science" and "good epidemiology": tobacco, lawyers, and public relations firms
    Am J Public Health 2001;91(11):1749-1757 [ PDF ]


  • Samet JM, Burke TA
    Turning science into junk: the tobacco industry and passive smoking
    Am J Public Health 2001;91(11):1742-1744 [ PDF ]


  • Yach D, Bialous SA
    Junking science to promote tobacco
    Am J Public Health 2001;91(11):1745-1748, November 2001 [ PDF ]


  • Muggli ME, Forster JL, Hurt RD, Repace JL
    The smoke you don't see: uncovering tobacco industry scientific strategies aimed against environmental tobacco smoke policies
    Am J Public Health 2001;91(9):1419-1423 [ PDF ]


  • Hirschhorn N, Bialous SA, Shatenstein S
    Philip Morris' new scientific initiative: an analysis
    Tobacco Control 2001;10(3):247-252 [ PDF ]


  • Drope J, Chapman S
    Tobacco industry efforts at discrediting scientific knowledge of environmental tobacco smoke: a review of internal industry documents
    J Epidemiol Community Health 2001;55(8):588-94 [ PDF ]


  • Rampton S, Stauber J
    How big tobacco helped create "the Junkman"
    PR Watch 2000;7(3) [ Online ]


  • Ong EK, Glantz SA
    Tobacco industry efforts subverting International Agency for Research on Cancer's second-hand smoke study
    Lancet 2000;355(9211):1253-1259 [ PDF ]


  • Barnes DE, Bero LA
    Why review articles on the health effects of passive smoking reach different conclusions
    JAMA 1998;279(19):1566-70 [ PDF ]


  • Barnes DE, Bero LA
    Scientific quality of original research articles on environmental tobacco smoke
    Tob Control 1997;6(1):19-26. [ Online ]


  • Barnes DE, Bero LA
    Industry-funded research and conflict of interest: an analysis of research sponsored by the tobacco industry through the Center for Indoor Air Research
    J Health Politics Policy Law 1996;21(3):515-42 [ PDF ]


  • Barnes DE, Hanauer P, Slade J, Bero LA, Glantz SA
    Environmental tobacco smoke. The Brown and Williamson documents
    JAMA 1995;274(3):248-53. [ PDF ]


  • Bero LA, Glantz SA, Rennie D
    Publication bias and public health policy on environmental tobacco smoke
    JAMA 1994;272(2):133-6 [ PDF ]


  • Bero L, Glantz S
    Tobacco industry response to a risk assessment of environmental tobacco smoke
    Tobacco Control 2:103-113, 1993 [ PDF ]

First comprehensive analysis of the secret tobacco industry documents.

  • Glantz SA, Slade JA, Bero LA, Hanauer P, Barnes DE
    The Cigarette Papers
    Berkeley: University of California Press 1996[ Online ]

Search these sites to find tobacco industry documents about their accommodation and ventilation programs

Keep up with tobacco-related news and info around the world.